M E M O R Y
O V E R F L O W

Hybridizing Anki and the Method of Loci to Learn Vocabulary

Anki for momentum and checks—memory palaces for high-fidelity retrieval and structure

Published on

It could be argued that the procedures I sketch—designing emblematic scenes, compressing them five by five, stitching them into exquisite-corpse collages—sound like artisanal labor subtracted from study. That impression comes from the description, not the work itself. Almost every step can be scripted: an API call from a vocabulary list to fetch images, a routine to compress-by-five, then a quick overlay. Yes, in my case trial-and-error toward an optimal pipeline for vocabulary acquisition pulled me away from texts for a while; it was deliberate. Theory-crafting was an end in itself. Sanskrit and Modern Greek gave me a pretext to test very old methods and bring them up to date. With millions learning languages and millions using Anki or similar SRS tools, a small contribution here feels worth the cost.

Why a Shared “Memory Palace for Languages” Doesn’t Exist

In an ideal world, the scenes I needed would already be painted by a polyglot community of loci enthusiasts. People on the main forum devoted to this ancient art, Art of Memory, do share systems, and generously so, yet I know of no collaborative project that aims at universal language learning through a principled blend of loci and the keyword method. The reason is obvious: cross-language associations are rooted in each person’s linguistic inventory and imaginative habits. If I use Spanish and Russian to encode a Sanskrit word, my rebus helps only someone with my languages in my configuration. Generalization breaks.

Max Ernst, André Masson, Max Morise, Cadavre exquis, Mar 18 1927
Max Ernst, André Masson, Max Morise, Cadavre exquis, Mar 18 1927

The Keyword Method’s Solipsism (and Its Costs)

The solipsism of keywords pains me. Bridges I build between my languages and Sanskrit are bridges only I can cross. Rebus imagery does have a unique virtue—the self-correction it affords mid-recital when walking the palace—but it also brings real drawbacks:

  • Unshareable assets. My emblems hinge on idiosyncratic puns; distributing such illustrations is near-meaningless to others.
  • Homophone hunting takes time. Even with several languages at hand, covering the phonetic surface of a Sanskrit word is fickle work. After a thousand words, facing a fresh tranche still carries a dull fear of failure. At first glance, some words morph into their Spanish, French, or English counterparts—the languages I know best—while others remain stubbornly refractory to that alchemy. Despairing of finding a word to anchor them to, my mind endures an ordeal… until a sudden illumination releases me. Soon enough, though, I have to try my luck again with the next batch.
  • Not Anki-friendly on the front. A rebus that spells out the syllables visually would make a front-side card trivial, almost pictographic. It short-circuits recall.
  • Motivational fatigue. Living in absurd images all day is numbing. Despite the technique’s raw efficacy, I grew tired of wading through that swamp of rebuses. I always study my Anki decks—sometimes after a short backlog—but I’ve let palaces idle. I know by experience I could restore them quickly; the problem is the spirit: pacing the same incoherent tableaux ad nauseam turns the stomach. Anki’s scheduler, by contrast, minimizes exposure.
Yves Tanguy, Time and Again, 1942
Yves Tanguy, Time and Again, 1942

The SRS Paradox: When Spacing Collides with Constant Walkthroughs

Spaced repetition works because you review when a trace is about to fade. The slight decay is the condition for strengthening. If I keep walking a palace every day, those words risk lingering in immediate memory rather than consolidating into the depths of long-term memory. I retrieve the most recent echo, not a distant one; easier links may be less durable. Perhaps a perfectly tended palace can stagnate in precisely the way Anki is designed to avoid. At any rate, a constant drill runs against Anki’s underlying principle.

What I’m After

All of the above pushed me to design a system that exploits Anki’s long-arc habit and spacing discipline and borrows the robust, low-friction retrieval of palaces—dense interconnections, reliable wayfinding, quick recovery from errors. I want the algorithm’s timing without its brittleness and frustration, and the palace’s structure without its motivational drag. The goal is not to abandon the walk, but to add spacing as a systematic spur and a quality check, so every word in the palace is demonstrably learned for keeps.

I’m building a hybrid: Anki schedules sanity checks to review; a memory palace allows for easy retrieval with perfect recall; five-scene overlays deliver density without confusion. The sum answers the core problems: portability, scale, motivation, and the SRS–palace timing paradox.